## Should Gravity be Quantized?

Merging quantum mechanics with general relativity is the
hardest problem of modern physics. In naive quantum field theory, treating
gravity quantum mechanically involves adding smaller and smaller distance
contributions to perturbation theory but this corresponds to higher and higher
energy scales and adding enough energy will eventually lead to creating a black
hole and the overall computation ends up predicting infinities. String theory,
loop quantum gravity, and non-commutative geometry have different ways to deal
with those infinities, but there are also approaches which challenge the need
to treat gravity using quantum theory. Those approaches are a minority view in
the physics community and I side with the majority point of view because I know
it is mathematically impossible to construct a self-consistent theory of
quantum and non-quantum mechanics. But wouldn't be nice to be able to put those
ideas to an experimental test?

Here is where a nice talk at DICE2014 by Dvir Kafri came
in. The talk was based on http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.4558 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3214 . The best way to explain is probably to
present it from the end, and here is the proposed experiment (from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.4558.pdf
).

Penrose advanced the idea of the gravitational collapse of
the wavefunction and Diosi refined this in the best available model so far. Rather
than looking at decoherence of objects due to gravity, Dvir instead asks the
following question: can two masses which only interact gravitationally become
entangled? Direct superposition experiments are out of the question, but how
about measuring some sort of residual quantum noise required to screen the entanglement
from occurring in the first place? Sure, since the gravitational coupling is so
weak, the noise needed to do this is really tiny, but what if we cool the
experiment close to absolute zero? One experiment is not enough because at 10
micro Kelvins you expect one thermal phonon to be emitted every 10 seconds and
the desired effect produces a phonon every 3000 seconds, but

**massively**replicating the experiment in parallel might work to extract the signal (replicate 10,000,000 times! – OK this is a bit in the realm of science fiction for now but maybe future technological advances will drop the price of such an experiment to something manageable).
Dvir motivates the experiment by modeling how two distant
objects can communicate by individually interacting with an intermediary
object.

Here is a slide picture from Dvir’s presentation (I thank
Dvir for providing me with a copy of his presentation)

Please note that position and momenta are non-commuting
operators. So you apply A first, followed by B, followed by –A and the by –B.
The intermediary F (a harmonic oscillator) is unchanged by this procedure, but
gains a geometric phase proportional to \( A \otimes B \). In other words this
is what happens:

If you break this process into n infinitesimal steps and
repeat n times, by a corollary of Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula you get:

\( {(t/n)}^{n} = exp (-it [H_A + H_B + A\otimes B]) \)

This picture is a simple model for how two objects can
become entangled, To prevent that entanglement (but still allow communication
between A and B), we add a “screen” S
which captures the coupling with the environment

By the monogamy of entanglement, this can only decrease the
entanglement between A and B.

Since the environment is learning about A and B through F,
Dvir invokes what he calls the “Observer Effect”: a measurement of observable
\( O \)

*necessarily*adds uncertainty to an non-commuting observable \( O^{’} \). In this case, the process of screening entanglement means that all observables not commuting with A and B become noisier.
Here is an experimental setup that is analogous to the first
experiment: S is a weak measurement and the purpose is to see the noise
generation, which is

**model-independent**in that the equations of motion are the same**.**
If a certain inequality is violated (relating the strenght
\( \eta \) of the \( A \otimes B \) interaction to the noise added to the
system), then the communication channel between the Alice-Bob system transmits
quantum information. Analogously, if we can verify that \( \eta \) is only due
to gravity (that is why there is a superconductor shield between the
oscillators coupled by gravitational attraction), by observing the noise and
checking the inequality we can conclude that gravity can convey quantum
information. Pretty neat.

PS: I thank Dvir for providing clarifying edits to this post.

PS: I thank Dvir for providing clarifying edits to this post.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment