The fundamental bipartite relations
Continuing from where we left off last time, we introduced the most general composite products for a bipartite system:
α12=a11α⊗α+a12α⊗σ+a21σ⊗α+a22σ⊗σ
σ12=b11α⊗α+b12α⊗σ+b21σ⊗α+b22σ⊗σ
The question now becomes: are the a's and b's parameters free, or can we say something abut them? To start let's normalize the products σ like this:
fσI=Iσf=f
which can always be done. Now in:
The question now becomes: are the a's and b's parameters free, or can we say something abut them? To start let's normalize the products σ like this:
fσI=Iσf=f
which can always be done. Now in:
(f1⊗f2)α12(g1⊗g2)=
=a11(f1αg1)⊗(f2αg2)+a12(f1αg1)⊗(f2σg2)+
+a21(f1σg1)⊗(f2αg2)+a22(f1σg1)⊗(f2σg2)
if we pick f1=g1=I :
if we pick f1=g1=I :
(I⊗f2)α12(I⊗g2)=
=a11(IαI)⊗(f2αg2)+a12(IαI)⊗(f2σg2)+
+a21(IσI)⊗(f2αg2)+a22(IσI)⊗(f2σg2)
and recalling from last time that IαI=0 from Leibniz identity we get:
f2αg2=a21(f2αg2)+a22(f2σg2)
which demands a21=1 and a22=0.
If we make the same substitution into:
(f1⊗f2)σ12(g1⊗g2)=
and recalling from last time that IαI=0 from Leibniz identity we get:
f2αg2=a21(f2αg2)+a22(f2σg2)
which demands a21=1 and a22=0.
If we make the same substitution into:
(f1⊗f2)σ12(g1⊗g2)=
=b11(f1αg1)⊗(f2αg2)+b12(f1αg1)⊗(f2σg2)+
+b21(f1σg1)⊗(f2αg2)+b22(f1σg1)⊗(f2σg2)
we get:
f2σg2=b21(f2αg2)+b22(f2σg2)
which demands b21=0 and b22=1
We can play the same game with f2=g2=I and (skipping the trivial details) we get two additional conditions: a12=1 and b12=0.
In coproduct notation what we get so far is:
Δ(α)=α⊗σ+σ⊗α+a11α⊗α
Δ(σ)=σ⊗σ+b11α⊗α
By applying Leibniz identity on a bipartite system, one can show after some tedious computations that a11=0. The only remaining free parameters is b11 which can be normalized to be ether -1, 0, or 1 (or elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic). Each choice corresponds to a potential theory of nature. For example 0 corresponds to classical mechanics, and -1 to quantum mechanics.
Elliptic composability is quantum mechanics! The bipartite products obey:
Δ(α)=α⊗σ+σ⊗α
Δ(σ)=σ⊗σ−α⊗α
Please notice the similarity with complex number multiplication. This is why complex numbers play a central role in quantum mechanics.
Now at the moment the two products do not respect any other properties. But we can continue this line of argument and prove their symmetry/anti-symmetry. And from there we can derive their complete properties arriving constructively at the standard formulation of quantum mechanics. Please stay tuned.
we get:
f2σg2=b21(f2αg2)+b22(f2σg2)
which demands b21=0 and b22=1
We can play the same game with f2=g2=I and (skipping the trivial details) we get two additional conditions: a12=1 and b12=0.
In coproduct notation what we get so far is:
Δ(α)=α⊗σ+σ⊗α+a11α⊗α
Δ(σ)=σ⊗σ+b11α⊗α
By applying Leibniz identity on a bipartite system, one can show after some tedious computations that a11=0. The only remaining free parameters is b11 which can be normalized to be ether -1, 0, or 1 (or elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic). Each choice corresponds to a potential theory of nature. For example 0 corresponds to classical mechanics, and -1 to quantum mechanics.
Elliptic composability is quantum mechanics! The bipartite products obey:
Δ(α)=α⊗σ+σ⊗α
Δ(σ)=σ⊗σ−α⊗α
Please notice the similarity with complex number multiplication. This is why complex numbers play a central role in quantum mechanics.
Now at the moment the two products do not respect any other properties. But we can continue this line of argument and prove their symmetry/anti-symmetry. And from there we can derive their complete properties arriving constructively at the standard formulation of quantum mechanics. Please stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment